CLICK HERE TO RETURN HOME
Indoor tanning is big business, with tanning trade publications reporting
this as a $2 billion-a-year industry in the United States. According to
industry estimates, 28 million Americans are tanning indoors annually at about
25,000 tanning salons around the country.
In fact, a recent study of more than 10,000 teens across the US found that
tanning bed use was increasing, especially among adolescent girls.
This does not bode well for the health of the nation. In 1994, a Swedish study found that women
18-30 years old who visited tanning parlors 10 times or more a year had seven
times greater incidence of melanoma than women who did not use tanning
salons. In another study, people exposed
to 10 full-body tanning salon sessions had a significant increase in skin
repair proteins typically associated with sun damage, indicating that
ultraviolet (UV) radiation from indoor tanning is as dangerous as UV from the
sun. And in 2002, a study from Dartmouth Medical School
found that tanning device users had 2.5 times the risk of squamous cell
carcinoma and 1.5 times the risk of basal cell carcinoma . And yet, even with all this evidence, the
tanning salons remain unrepentant.
The tanning industry relies on two misleading arguments: first,
that since melanoma is mainly caused by sunburn, "controlled" tanning helps
prevent melanoma by building up the protective pigment melanin; second, that UV
exposure makes the skin produce vitamin D, which helps prevent breast, prostate
and colon cancer, as well as other diseases.
Medical experts refute these arguments. They point out that our diet (especially
vitamin D-rich foods such as dairy products and salmon) generally provides all
the vitamin D we need. Furthermore,
tanning to increase melanin is counterproductive. Tanning, like burning, causes genetic damage
to skin cells. "You can't protect the
skin by damaging it," said James M. Spencer, MD, director of dermatologic
surgery at Mount Sinai Medical Center
in New York City. "Tanning not only increases the risk for
melanoma and squamous cell carcinoma, but accelerates skin aging."
There have been several attempts made to regulate the
industry, by physician groups as well as state and national congresspeople and
the World Health Organization, with limited success. The FDA is weighing stricter controls over
tanning devices, but has not yet instituted any changes. The tanning industry has fought all of these
measures. "Tanning manufacturers and
salon owners keep lobbying the FDA and state agencies to soften regulations,
claiming that tanning is healthful," said Dr. Spenser.
Unfortunately, even when regulation has occurred, it hasn't
solved the problems. "Regulation can't
make tanning safe," declared Michael Franzblau, MD, clinical professor of dermatology,
University of California School of Medicine, San Francisco. "Banning salons is the only answer."
He should know, because he was instrumental in the passage
of legislation regulating tanning facilities in California.
The law, passed in 1988, unfortunately had no mechanism for registration
of tanning parlors or collection of fees from owners. "Hence, there is no enforcement," notes Dr.
Franzblau.
Some states require salons to provide UV-protective eyewear
or have machine operators remain present throughout a client's session. Others require a sign on the booth warning
people who always sunburn that tanning puts them at high risk for skin
damage. Whatever the regulations, says
Dr. Franzblau, there's no assurance they will be complied with. "I've taken teams of scientists into salons
where not one requirement was being followed."
Other studies have shown that tanning salons frequently exceed "safe" UV
limits. The average salon patron in North Carolina was
recently found to exceed FDA limits by 95 percent.
Is banning salons outright the only answer? Dr. Franzblau believes that eliminating
tanning salons "would be 100 percent more effective" than regulating them. And it could save millions of lives.
CLICK HERE TO VIEW OUR SELECTION OF SUNLESS TANNING LOTIONS; START BEING HEALTHIER TODAY
*information found on skincancer.org